Category Archives: ebooks

Red Star Falling is out now

Well, m’readers, Red Star Falling–book one in my Agents Temporal series–is now avail­able from that large Luxembourg-based com­pany we all love to hate. Thanks to every­one who helped me get this out the door.

The mys­ter­i­ous organ­isa­tion known only by its ini­tials: Meta.

The miss­ing 100,000 roubles of the 1907 Yerevan Square Expropriation and its smug­gler, the Georgian out­law known as Soso.

Meta Agent Singular, Saskia Brandt, on a mis­sion from the future.

The north face of the Eiger—treacherous, unclimbed, enshadowed—waiting for the money, the out­law, and the Agent Singular.

Agent Singular: Particular. Special. One-shot.

Saskia Brandt returns in this action-packed story from the writer of best­seller Déjà Vu.

Red star falling cover

Wheat, Meet Chaff. Chaff, Meet Wheat.

Scott Pack on the influx of self-published work to ebooks:

So I wel­come this influx, these pre­vi­ously unpub­lished hoards.

There’s more:

And here’s the thing: a ‘tra­di­tional’ deal is still the goal of most of these authors. OK, so there are many who have eschewed the sys­tem and will con­tinue to do so but the major­ity would love the cred­ib­il­ity, sup­port and, er, lower roy­alty rate that a deal with one of the major pub­lish­ing houses would bring. Most do feel that pub­lish­ers add value and see the self-publishing option as a new route to being ‘dis­covered’. And if they remain undis­covered they are still able make a few quid, which can soften the blow.

I guess I’m one of these authors look­ing for a tra­di­tional deal. Frankly, I’d rather have pro­fes­sion­als take care of the cover, copy­ed­it­ing, and so on. Many e-self-published writers feel this way. That’s the major plus against the minus of lower royalties.

Incrementing Your Conversion Rate

I’m writ­ing this post using a Mac applic­a­tion called MarsEdit. The guy who makes it is Daniel Jalkut. Last week, he gues­ted on Marco Arment’s Build and Analyze pod­cast, which is aimed at soft­ware developers but often con­tains insights that inde­pend­ent authors can learn from. Daniel’s a nice bloke. I know this because we had an email exchange a few months back about a fea­ture I’d like to see in MarsEdit.

In the pod­cast, Daniel said some­thing about incre­ment­al­ity that seemed appos­ite. When he took over the cod­ing of MarsEdit (from Brent Simmons of NetNewsWire fame), he thought about the unit sales of the soft­ware. It sold on aver­age three per day. This led to what New Worlders call ‘a fair chunk of change’, but it was some­what less than the fig­ure that Daniel could live on.

He thought back to the old soft­ware adage that, if one hun­dred people view your soft­ware, and three buy it, you’ve got your­self a decent con­ver­sion rate. Daniel thought about the product in terms of increas­ing that con­ver­sion rate. How well designed was the ini­tial set-up? How did the soft­ware work for novice users? He tweaked the applic­a­tion and increased sales.

I’m not one who shies away from money-related talk when it comes to writ­ing. If you don’t talk about it, there are plenty who will — par­tic­u­larly these days, when more and more writers are tak­ing home non-trivial monthly roy­al­ties thanks to the suc­cess of e-publishing.

Bullshit Bingo aside, incre­ment­ing your con­ver­sion means look­ing at the product — a book, per­haps — and work­ing to get that extra one-percent of read­ers to buy your book. If you see a typo, kill it, upload the new ver­sion. If it takes a reader too long to get to the first page of the story because you’ve front-loaded the book with review quotes, shorten it, upload it. What does the reader see when they land on your Amazon page? A bio that’s out of date? Get bib­lical on the arse of the text.

You see where I’m going. It’s an obvi­ous point, per­haps, but chan­ging your atti­tude from ‘I’ll fix it later’ to ‘I’ll fix it now’ won’t only improve your story. Readers notice these things. Just take a look at a few reviews for self-published books on Amazon: present­a­tion is a theme.

As I say, it’s an inter­est­ing pod­cast, and well worth a listen.

Proper Job Free Today and Tomorrow

I’m invest­ig­at­ing this Kindle Select busi­ness, which is a new ser­vice offered by Amazon that allows Kindle authors to put their books for­ward for a lend­ing scheme. The catch is that Amazon requires such an author to pub­lish via the Kindle plat­form exclus­ively. Not such a catch for me, as I sell, on aver­age, zero books elsewhere.

Once an author’s book is in the Kindle Select pro­gramme, it is eli­gible for five days of free pro­mo­tion every ninety days. So, as an exper­i­ment, I’m mak­ing my novel Proper Job free for today and tomor­row, just to see what happens.

Update at 11:30

I was con­cerned about what would hap­pen to the rank of a pro­moted book. That is, when being pro­moted, at what pos­i­tion would the book enter the ‘free’ chart? Would it even go into the ‘free’ chart, or just be marked as ‘free’ in the paid chart? After the pro­mo­tion, at what pos­i­tion would it re-enter the paid chart?

Well, Proper Job has essen­tially had its rank­ing stripped. It no longer has a rank­ing accord­ing to its Amazon inform­a­tion page, and on the KDP dash­board (the back-end that authors have access to), the rank­ing inform­a­tion is marked as ‘unavail­able’. So it looks as though pro­moted books are de-indexed.

However, this doesn’t mean that people can’t find the book. 14 cop­ies were ‘sold’ in the US since it became free; and 26 in the UK. To put that in per­spect­ive, I’ve sold at 86p only 34 cop­ies of Proper Job since it was pub­lished in November.

I’ll post more data here as it becomes available.

Update at 12:00

Amazon has now indexed Proper Job in the ‘free’ chart, so I guess there isn’t a ‘limbo’ chart after all. The delay is almost cer­tainly a lag due to data­base updates and let­ting an hour’s worth of ‘sales’ accrue to com­pute the new ranking.

As a data point, Proper Job was ranked at pos­i­tion 8,299 in yesterday’s paid chart and is now at 1, 665 in the free chart. That’s for the UK. In the US, the rank­ing is still classed as unknown.

Update at 20:30

Now ranked at 862 in the US for free books, and 34 in the Humor chart. In the UK, it’s at 304 in the over­all chart and 18 in the Humour chart. US sales: 183. UK sales: 92.

★ Proper Job

It has been a long time com­ing, but today I pub­lish Proper Job, a com­edy novel whose first draft I com­pleted more than seven years ago (US). How do I feel? Exhausted. Pleased. Quite inter­ested to see how well the book will do on the Kindle plat­form in com­par­ison to Déjà Vu and Flashback. I feel that sci­ence fic­tion does well in ebook form; but Proper Job, being a com­edy lack­ing in lasers, bug-eyed mon­sters and time travel, should have a broader appeal.

The book evolved on sev­eral fronts across the course of its devel­op­ment. The ini­tial draft was edgier. Its main char­ac­ter — then called Fabe, not Andy — was a crueller indi­vidual. It was novel where the main char­ac­ter and the reader laughed ‘at’ things. Now, the novel is one where the laughter is ‘with’.

Structurally, too, I changed some ele­ments to take it away from the some­what Hollywood three-act struc­ture. These expli­cit frame­works are well and good in ret­ro­spect, but my exper­i­ence of writ­ing Proper Job has con­firmed my pre­ju­dice that they are best applied in ret­ro­spect to help fix prob­lems. They can­not be used as a blue­print. (That is, I can’t use them like that.)

So here it is. The final draft is about 60,000 words, I believe. With revi­sions, I prob­ably worked through 200,000 or more.

Subtext and — of course — schmub­text. However, Proper Job is also about my rela­tion­ship with Cornwall.

Thanks to my stal­wart editor Clare Christian and equally stal­wart proofer Olivia Wood, without whom Proper Job would be a wibbly pile of kack.

Publish and be damned.

Cover for KDP

★ Ebook Q & A

M’colleague Matt F W Curran recently sent me some ques­tions about my adven­tures in the ebook trade. I thought my answers might be use­ful to oth­ers, so I’ve pos­ted them here.

Did you e-publish via an e-publisher?

No, I decided that it would be best to con­trol the pro­cess myself. One of the more frus­trat­ing parts of being an author is being unable to cor­rect typos in the final book, blurb, and so on. Amazon makes this trivial. My research prior to going it alone also demon­strated that many ebooks pub­lished on an author’s behalf were hor­rendously format­ted, pre­sum­ably because the job was given lower pri­or­ity and fewer resources than the more pres­ti­gi­ous print edition.

If so, what is their com­mis­sion and would you do it again?

I’ve left this ques­tion in because I did, a few months back, use the online ser­vice Smashwords. This ser­vice takes your book (format­ted in Word — alarm bells ringing yet?) and spits it out to mul­tiple online retail­ers, includ­ing Barnes and Noble. I used this because it was the only way I could get my book onto iBooks. Smashwords wanted the doc­u­mented format­ted accord­ing to some unusual con­ven­tions. I hired a nice American lady to do this for me. She trades under the name MediaWorx. I paid her $45 and she did a flaw­less job. Ultimately, it was for noth­ing, because Smashwords uses a gen­eric tool to con­vert your Word doc­u­ment into dif­fer­ent ver­sions for the online ser­vices, and the out­put is embar­rass­ingly cruddy. Fortunately, I’ve only sold about 4 cop­ies via Smashwords. The vast major­ity of my sales have been through Amazon.

If you didn’t e-publish via an e-publisher and did it wholly alone, has it been easy?

I’ll inter­pret that ‘easy’ as a rel­at­ive term. Yes, it was very easy. When I was pub­lished by a small press, I had to do all my own mar­ket­ing. I had to wait months for roy­alty cheques that never came; had no clue where review cop­ies had been sent; had to put up with a dodgy cover; had all kinds of issues with dis­tri­bu­tion; had to turn up in per­son and make myself a nuis­ance on a shop-by-shop basis to get word out.

And do you think there are any bene­fits to being pub­lished via an inde­pend­ent e-publisher regard­less of the sac­ri­fice in terms of profits? In other words would it add rel­ev­ance or legit­im­acy to your work to be seen to be pub­lished inde­pend­ently rather than self-published?

My first response is a mis­in­ter­pret­a­tion of your ques­tion, which I’ve left in. The ques­tion I thought I read was: “Are there advant­ages to being tra­di­tion­ally published?”

The simple answer is “Yes”. I grew up in an era where writers still used type­writers and my dreams of suc­cess (that is, selling a book to some­body) were all wrapped up in weighty, paper manu­scripts, lunch meet­ings with agents, and see­ing myself on the shelf of a book­shop. I still want that and I can’t help it. The desire, how­ever, is irra­tional. I’m immeas­ur­ably bet­ter off now.

And now for the answer to your actual question:

There could cer­tainly be bene­fits in terms of time-saving, but I think all the tools you need for a good book are at your dis­posal. Hire your own editor. I can sug­gest Clare Christian or Olivia Wood. Hire a cover designer, such as Emma Barnes. The trick­ier bit is the lay­out of your book, but you can prob­ably hire someone to do that too. I’m not whether it’s a good use of money to hire a middle man (the ‘pub­lisher’ again) to do this for you.

How much do cover-designs cost?

I’ve got three cov­ers. The first, Deja Vu, was a stock photo from iStockPhoto.com, which I bought for about £50 and worked into my own design. Flashback was designed pro­fes­sion­ally by Emma Barnes for £699.13 (though I’ve since star­ted using another design based on an iStock­Photo vec­tor, which works bet­ter as a thumb­nail; I’ll use the Barnes design for a paper­back). The cover for my romantic com­edy Proper Job is a com­bin­a­tion of two vec­tor graph­ics, totalling about £80, which I put together in my own design.

Are you mak­ing enough money for it to be a financially-worthwhile endeav­our (of course, simply being read is worth­while any­way, but for the extra effort and time put it to get it out there — was it worthwhile?).

In a word, yes. My cur­rent income from the books since March is £2,072.11 and $222. Outgoings are £1,268.40. Profit about £800 before tax. That’s not huge, but the ini­tial costs are all fixed.

How did you come to the price point of the two books? I note that Flashback changed to a cheaper price — did that help?

I wanted the books to be free. (I’m lucky enough to have a full time job as an aca­demic, so I was pre­pared to pay for the cov­ers and edit­ing myself.) Since that wasn’t straight­for­ward, I made them as cheap as pos­sible. This took a little nerve, I must admit, par­tic­u­larly when I saw the ini­tial sales take off, but it’s import­ant to remem­ber that I’m in a pos­i­tion where nobody knows who I am. I want as many people to read my books as pos­sible. Meanwhile, I’ll be mak­ing a brand of my name if I’m any good. There is room for increas­ing the price later on, but for now it’s as well to remem­ber that the mar­ket is not demand­ing my books at all. They’re buy­ing them on a ‘Why not?’ basis. If I increased the price sig­ni­fic­antly (say, into the 70% roy­alty rate, which needs a sale price of £1.70, I think), it’s very likely that I would flat­ten my sales.

Secondly, I’m in it for the long haul.

As for the price of Flashback, I did increase that briefly to £1.70. That was, in ret­ro­spect, prob­ably an irra­tional move motiv­ated by the price of its cover. I wasn’t sure at the time that the sales pro­file of Deja Vu would remain the same. Turns out it did. When Flashback earned back the cost of its cover, I dropped its price. The sales cor­rel­ated very closely with price.

★ Is the Kindle Store 1000 Times Better Than Apple’s iBooks and Smashwords?

Probably not.

But the data for sales of my novel, Déjà Vu, which I’ve pub­lished on the Kindle, iBooks and Smashwords, point to a sales ratio of about 1000:1.

Kindle Sales

Déjà Vu unit sales per month, begin­ning in March, are: 320, 938, 915, 738, 844, 643 and 581.

Smashwords (this includes Barnes and Noble, and a bil­lion other ebook stores)

For the same period: 4.

iBooks

For the same period: 1.

Overall, then, the ratio of sales Kindle:other is 4979:5. Call it 1000:1. If Déjà Vu is rep­res­ent­at­ive of more gen­eral trends (it won’t be; but it’s in the ball­park, I expect), the Kindle store could be around 1000 times more suc­cess­ful than the other stores com­bined. Remember that the blurb, cover image and price are identical across stores.

What Leads to These Differences?

All of my mar­ket­ing — if you can call it that — has poin­ted people to the Kindle store.

Amazon has a lar­ger cus­tomer base to begin with, so cross-promotion will be more effect­ive. That is, when Déjà Vu is recom­men­ded to people who have a his­tory of buy­ing sim­ilar titles, there are more of those people around to see the recom­mend­a­tion. It could well be that many people see Déjà Vu on Amazon when they’re not look­ing for it; few see my book on Smashwords or iBooks.

Amazon has a mature chart-based shop­front. I don’t think Smashwords does this very well. And when I (rarely) look at iBooks, the charts seem to be full of odd books, and they are all writ­ten by Jeremy Clarkson. Nothing wrong with that; but it sug­gests a smal­ler num­ber of readers.

For the ver­sion of Déjà Vu sold on Amazon, I can con­trol the look and feel of the ebook pre­cisely. The ver­sion sold on Smashwords is pro­duced using a Word tem­plate and, frankly, it looks like a piece of crap. Blockquotes don’t work prop­erly; indent­a­tion is shot to hell. Likewise, the ver­sion for iBooks looks awful. Now, ebooks aren’t meant to look beau­ti­ful — but the cre­ator should be able to provide a well-designed doc­u­ment whose struc­ture melts away so that the reader can enjoy the story.

A Caveat

It’s worth not­ing that both iBooks and Smashwords are push­ing huge num­bers of books. Scott Pack recently repor­ted large sales num­bers for Confessions of a GP. And my friend Stephen J Sweeney has been selling his Battle for the Solar System books like gang­busters across many plat­forms. But Amazon has the lion’s share of this mar­ket for now.