Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Where Authors Dare

At the height of his success, Alistair MacLean (1922-1987) was the world's best selling author. You might have heard of HMS Ulysses, The Guns of Navarone, Ice Station Zebra, and (the original screenplay) Where Eagles Dare. I remember reading his books as a teenager, after my friend Edward picked up a copy of Fear is the Key from a local, Cornish jumble sale. MacLean is interesting because - like Stephen King - he was seldom reviewed, and his work was dismissed as drivel. Doubly interestingly, the first person to dismiss MacLean's work as drivel was MacLean himself.

A couple of weeks ago, I was passing a car boot sale ('jumble sale' is so last century), and noticed a biography of MacLean. I snatched it up, partly because it meant I wouldn't have to read any more of Monica Ali's Brick Lane (which is startlingly uninteresting, despite the plaudits; not in the God-awful Life of Pi league, but applying for promotion).

Alistair MacLean: A Life by Jack Webster is a superb read. Webster, despite his best efforts, does not sink into the background; he remains a rather pompous tour guide who rolls out colonial-area thoughts on non-Anglo Saxons and women (you should read what he thinks about those who fall into both categories, like MacLean's second wife, Marcelle).

I don't want to spend too much time on a chronology of MacLean, so here is the bluffer's guide: MacLean grew up a son of the manse (I still have no idea what this means), and his mother was a gold medal winner of the Mod (also no idea, but I'll bet it trumps my bronze Water Safety). He had a traditional upbringing in which Gaelic was the household language. As a young man, he put to sea on the notorious Russian convoy route, where he manned the torpedo room of a destroyer charged with the defence of low-laden Russian cargo ships. This formed the basis of his first novel, HMS Ulysses. Following his discharge, he could not be described as demob happy. He was a taciturn, gaunt fellow who often mumbled. He never spoke of his wartime experiences. Before long, he became an English school teacher - regarded as fair and quiet by his pupils. His heart was never in the job (and, judging by this book, he never found a place to put it). He tried his hand a short story competition run by a local newspaper and, to his surprise, won it. His style was so electrifying that he was courted by the publisher Collins (now HarperCollins) and then embarked upon a career that led to considerable fame and fortune, and a nomadic existence that centred on Geneva but extended to California and Yugoslavia. He died in 1987, aged 65, of a stroke, leaving a somewhat fragmented family and a considerable fortune. The man: largely unhappy, thought of himself as a hack, and listed his job on his passport as 'Hotelier'.

Which brings me to MacLean's fiction. Time and again, Webster returns, in his biography, to the notion that a page-turning book does not have the same status (in terms of its apparent quality) as a book that attempts to do more (on those other fictional planes). MacLean bought into this, and Webster seems to as well. I'm not sure I do. In my own fiction, I tend to aim for these other levels of meaning, but they must be subservient to the fundamental 'straight line speed' of the book's story. This ability to pace, to pull the reader along with questions that they must know the answer to, is not one so easily dismissed. Frankly, very few authors can do it.

True enough, MacLean's prose style is quite different from that employed today. Like Walter Scott, he might not be read overmuch in the coming years. But I remember looking somewhat sceptically at the cover to 'Fear is the Key', the book handed to me by my friend Edward at that jumble sale, and then I read the first page. It had me hooked. This was a story. MacLean may have hated his own stuff, but how many writers have readers who say, 'This is a story'? Not so many.



Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Friday, July 21, 2006

Aliya Whiteley's Book Launch

Last night I had the pleasure of attending the North Devon book launch of Three Things About Me, the new book from Aliya Whiteley. Her publisher is Macmillan New Writing, of whom many people have had many things to say. The quality of the books, of course, speaks for itself. So far I've read Aliya's, Roger's, and Michael's, and I'd say they're all sterling efforts.

Aliya's launch was co-organised by Ottakar's and Barnstaple Library and she did a fine job of summarising her book and giving the sixty-plus listeners a taste of the first chapter. I had to shoot off just after the reading, but Aliya was kind enough to sign my copy and chat to me about the Macmillan publishing process. We also remembered the ordeal of editing Déjà Vu - my editor was one Aliya Whiteley - and I could thank her, in person, for pulling so many of my irons out of the fire. Aliya's book should be available in all good bookshops.


Technorati Tags: , ,

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Superman Returns

Last night, I dragged my girlfriend along to a screening of Superman Returns, director Bryan Singer's attempt to re-invigorate the Superman franchise following the bloody awful Superman IV (which I saw with my dad, I think, back in 1987 or so). The irreplaceable Christopher Reeve has been replaced by Brandon Routh, an unknown (just as Reeve was unknown before he filmed Superman: The Movie).

I loved Superman as a kid, but only the films, not the comic or cartoon. I never watched the original 1950s American TV series because, to my jaundiced eight-year-old eye, the special effects weren't good enough. I did, however, pester my mum for several years until she (or, rather, my dad) decked out my room with Superman wallpaper. So I speak somewhat as a fan.

In Superman Returns, Superman has been absent for five years following a trip to his destroyed home planet of Krypton, whose location has been pinpointed by Earth astronomers. In the meantime, Lois Lane has given birth to a son - now five years old - and is in a stable relationship with Jason White (who, by the way, is played by debutant Tristan Lake Leabu, and hot damn if that isn't a screen name of the first water). Lex Luthor has been released from prison because Superman could not attend his parole hearing as a witness; Luthor has plans to raid the Fortress of Solitude and steal the alien technology of Superman's homeworld. What a git.

The experience of the movie is a enjoyable one. Bryan Singer has directed a work that is, in many ways, a tribute to Richard Donner's original, and Singer uses the same music and even title sequence. (Remember those 3D whooshing titles from the first movie? They cost more than the entire shooting budget of most 1978 movies.) This similarity is the main strength of the movie, but it is also the chief weakness. The film is haunted by the ghost of Christopher Reeve. Brandon Routh, our new Superman, is almost a doppelgänger of the dead actor. In addition, Routh plays Clark Kent with the klutzy charm that Reeve brought to the role. To compound this physical similarity, New York once more doubles as Metropolis, and a number of scenes from Donner's first film are treated to uncomfortable reprises: gags are recycled, cinematographic frames are repeated, and sometimes entire lines get a second outing. To be fair, Routh is not just a good actor, he's excellent; and Singer is not just a good director (X-Men, X-Men II and The Usual Suspects were sterling efforts). But, for me, as person who can recite chunks of dialogue from the first film, these nods to the gallery undermined its capacity to stand on its own two (red booted) feet.

Some of the themes were interesting, too. I won't provide too much detail because I don't want to spoil the film, but this is certainly a post 9/11 film. Lois Lane is about to receive the Pulitzer for her editorial "Why the world doesn't need Superman"; one of the messages of the film is that, in this day and age, we need something like Superman. Either the man, in the case of the characters in the film, or the idea, in the case of the audience. Overall, this is a good story, well told, and don't be surprised if Superman Returns again and again.


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Saturday, July 15, 2006

The FrontList

A few months ago, Tom Lodge contacted me (or I contacted him; can't remember) about his new site, The FrontList. Essentially, this site provides a free service whereby aspiring authors submit their prose and have it ranked by other writers. Each month, the cream of the crop will be placed - in dainty dish stylee - before agents and publishers who specialise in a given genre. How come it's free? Well, writers are required to provide critiques before they can upload stuff themselves. Like any peer-review service, of course, you can get the occasional bizarreness, but since critiquing others' work will almost certainly improve your own, this site looks like one that is worth a go.


Technorati Tags: ,

Getting Biblical on Your Book's Ass

The American spelling of 'ass', of course. 'Arse' wouldn't do the job. Just wanted to point that out in order to pre-empt emails that fall into either of two categories: (1) That I can't spell 'ass'; (2) That I wish to promote violence towards beasts of burden.

I'm talking, in this instance, of the long job of writing a book - Flashback. The first draft was completed a couple of months ago, and now I've returned to the manuscript following a break. There are many chores. Some of these are artistic: I take a scene, attempt to work out the point of it, decide on a way of reconfiguring it for maximum impact, and re-write it in 'final draft' mode (this last is a game I play with myself; like hell it'll be the final draft).

Tediously, the majority my work rests upon the answers to research questions. What's the rank of the lowest investigative officer in the German border police? How fast would an aircraft be flying at the point of vertical impact following a dive from 30,000 feet? What day of the week is it? What's the age of Jem, my main viewpoint character?

And that's before I consider the convoluting effect of time travel.

Some writers produce a 'bible' that stores all their information about the fictional world. Character biographies, timelines, all that. For reasons I can't quite articulate - it has something to do with the idea that 'proper writers' don't plan their books, an idea I picked up as a teenager and have yet to truly evaluate - I feel that information in a notebook is dead information. I want the information to stay in my head and rub alongside all the other bits as I write. I do this to serve the unconscious writing mechanism that seems to be responsible for the major thematic elements of my work, and perhaps it is an appropriate method for the first draft - which should be the formation of an emotional, not physical, landscape - but now I find myself sorely in need of basic information.

So do I go biblical? Hmm. Maybe. Perhaps at the third draft. Planning reeks of constraint, and I want all stories decisions to serve the emotional landscape, not the physical. Where there is a conflict, the physical landscape will need to be changed. For example, if I want my main character to change from someone with a troubled criminal past to someone with a troubled psychiatric past because this, in some way, improves the book, then the physical landscape - conversations, memories, motivations - will just have to get with the programme. (This is something I did in the middle of the first draft.)

But it's true enough that the physical landscape will need to be served at some point. The novel works like that: It starts as a (overwhelmingly) creative act and slowly transforms into a lot of paperwork. Perhaps I'm just putting off the inevitable; perhaps I should get with the programme myself.

For those with an interest in such things, here is a brief excerpt (draft two) from near the beginning of the novel, in which the heroine, Jem, returns to the Berlin apartment of her dead friend, Saskia. She finds a man there. Though she does not yet know it, the man is a killer.


When Jem arrived at the door to Saskia’s apartment building, it was another midnight, and the drizzle had worked its way down her collar and into her boots. Her wet tights itched and a zit had taken root in the corner of her mouth. Her belly, though empty, was bloated and sore. Jem lifted her chin to the rain. She had no language to trap the wedding-cake edges of the apartment building. But its sad curlicues were like glasses lifted to toast elegant times, and it felt right that Saskia would live here. Sadness flared match-like in her belly and her mood switched from hope that Saskia was still alive, in this building and cursing Jem, to a sudden creepiness, a certainty that Saskia had died in the crash but her essence yet walked, unreflecting, across the ebony decks of her apartment. The spookiness filled her like the gases of rotting meat. She saw a Saskia-shaped hole in the air next to her. Rain stayed faithful to its shape and dribbled over the bob-cut of her hair, ran down ghost shoulders, and kept two patches dry on the pavement where Saskia might have stood in her flat shoes.

“Flat in case I need to run.”

Jem stepped back from the apparition, alarmed that her eyes attended the voice of her grief, and the ghost Saskia dissolved. The rain reclaimed her space and she was lost.

Jem pressed the buzzer marked ‘Frau Dorfer’. The door hummed to indicate it was unlocked.

Bitte.

A man’s voice. Not, she thought, Inspector Duczyński.

Jem pushed through the door. The stairwell was dark and echoic. She pressed the light and heard the timer rotate as she climbed the stairs. Her legs were slow. She reached Saskia’s door. It was open an inch. The squeak of rubbing cloth confirmed her fear, but it was only her rucksack as she shifted. She knocked. She stared into the skinny gap and understood that she could not see into the gloom as easily as someone could look out from it. Then the stairwell light clicked off to complete the darkness. The door swung inwards.

In the small lobby, where Saskia had once flicked away her shoes and explained to Jem that they were flat in case she needed to run, there was an old gentleman rendered sepia by dusty bulb above the coats. Behind him, the staircase rose to darkness. He might have been a count opening the door of his castle to a traveller at night.

Seien nicht erschrocken Sie,” he said.

His eyes were rheumy and his eyebrows flamboyant ticks of white. His hair was thin, rusty at the temples. His throat was swollen by a cravate. He wore a pullover with dull epaulettes and elbow patches. His short cane: Jem judged it to be an affectation. Despite his age, there was something of Saskia about him.

His free hand reached towards her. She frowned at the way his fingertips gathered to a point, like a raptor. She stepped back.

Bitte seien nicht erschrocken Sie,” he said.

“No, I’m English.”

The quick nod betrayed his talent as an improviser. “You must be one of Saskia’s friends from the reading group. She mentioned that a young English woman attended.” He inclined his head. “Partly to explain the slang in Nick Hornby novels.”

Jem wanted to burst au contrare, she was just a lesbo tart. She would unleash this with a smile. His composure would crystallize, fissure, and slide from his face. But her breath stalled.

“My poor girl,” he said, “come inside.”

She allowed him to cup her elbow and bring her across the threshold. Jem jettisoned her coat, which was heavy like wet washing, and tucked her rucksack into the space where Saskia stored her umbrellas.

She followed the stranger up the stairs. His shoes were wet, like hers. At the landing, he turned and tapped his left shin with the cane. “It is sensitive to the weather. Rain is the worst.”

“The hallway light is on the left at the top,” she said.

“I know. Here.”

He pressed it and Saskia’s spirit returned with brilliance: the antique phone in the middle of the hallway, next to the opening that led to the kitchen; a ‘wooden man’ kung fu thingy, with Jem’s special-occasion knickers hanging from a stump; a poster from the Checkpoint Charlie Museum that showed a young border guard leaping a barricade; the rippled glass door that led to the living room and the balcony; the nearby indoor palm tree; the black door; the sideboard with Saskia’s neon weight-training gloves crossed on top; the ebony floor. Jem could smell the toast that Saskia had cooked for her that morning. Saskia had been singing. She had a beautiful voice. When asked, she pretended to forget the name of the song.

“I’m Jem,” she said.

The man turned. He, too, had been contemplating the hallway. “My name is Kirby.”

At last, they shook hands. His palm had a rough island of knotted skin and, on instinct, Jem turned it upward.

“An old burn,” said Kirby. He made a fist but Jem had already read ‘Pyrene’.

“Pyrene?”

“They make fire extinguishers.” He smiled. “Ironically.”

“I came,” blurted Jem, “to see if Saskia…”

“Let me fix you a drink.”

“Saskia kept a whisky bottle on the left of the dishwasher.”

Kirby searched her face. “I know.”

Jem, embarrassed, looked at her own hands. An apology wanted to climb her throat but she pressed her teeth together. She raised her head with a question – what, by the way, are you doing here? – and saw an empty hallway. In a single click of time, Jem understood that she did not want to be alone . Another thought fell upon the last: She would search the apartment for Kirby but never find him, ever. He would be the last ghost in the story of her fugue from England, a punchline to widen eyes, souvenir from loop-the-loop land.

“Mr Kirby?”

She heard movement in the kitchen. Relief. Kirby came out. He no longer had the cane. Instead he carried two tumblers.


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Pause In Posts

While I pop off to Germany for a few days. Tschuesie.

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

The Arguments Continue

It appears that Millington - as I call him, sans forename - has jumped from the literary bushes with another of his humorous epistles, which you can read here. Apologies for the somewhat belligerent nature of that first sentence, but it appears that I have been struck off Millington's email list, and this constitutes a sulk. Grudgingly, I must tell you he is a very good writer, which I note here and here.


Technorati Tags:

My Thoughts On Editing


Image (c) Copyright FreeFoto.com
As if you aren't pig-sick of them already...but Roland Hulme, of whom I have blogged, asked me for my thoughts on the writing and editing process. Here's my favourite bit:

An unedited book is like an unprepared actor going on stage; some are talented improvisers, but most will die on their arse.

Read more, if you can stand it, at Roland's blog.



Technorati Tags: ,

The Back of Beyond


My girlfriend and I went to see the American animated comedy Over The Hedge last night. The verdict: Generally good, with some great acting talent, well-constructed set pieces, and the visuals were consistently gorgeous. Kids will love it. On last night's evidence, some will actually wet themselves with pleasure. I can't remember the last time I wet myself with pleasure, but I'm almost certain it wasn't at the cinema.

Listeners to The Good Doctor on BBC Five Live might be familiar with the phrase 'This film represents the death of narrative cinema', which Dr Kermode extorts his listeners to shout after films like Ice Age II - which, though passable, suffers from a lack of narrative backbone. I must tell you, gentle reader, that I was powerful tempted (as they used to say in Rawhide) to make this announcement over the credits of Over The Hedge. Why? Because, as we see so often, the film fires on all cylinders but one: script.

Script writing is, of course, a collaborative effort. And where McDuck-sized swimming pools of ingots are concerned, the collaboration goes up a gear. This seems to push the story structure towards archetypical elements that, it is presumed, speak to the hearts o'everyone. I'm not so sure. When aggressively applied, these rules suck the life out of a story. It isn't enough to have your embattled protagonist get his call to adventure on script page 5, end Act 1 with a set-piece that sees him almost achieve his goals, start Act 3 with a last, desperate attempt to achieve them, yada yada yada. The narrative structure of Over The Hedge is virtually identical to Chicken Run. Why? Because Chicken Run made money?

Over The Hedge isn't the death of narrative cinema, but I can hear John Lassiter shouting "Code blue!" Let's hope his defib panels have some oomph.



Technorati Tags: , , ,

Sunday, July 02, 2006

Buy A Friend A Book

Welcome to Day 3 of Buy a Friend a Book's First Anniversary Contest!


Buy a Friend a Book -- the site that urges visitors to surprise their friends with the gift of books during four quarterly BAFAB weeks a year -- is throwing a week-long puzzle contest to celebrate the site's first anniversary. Every day from July 1st to July 6th a new puzzle will be unveiled at one of the literary sites helping out with BAFAB's First Anniversary Contest. This Writing Life is your co-host for the third day of the puzzle. Contest participants will be asked to solve six puzzles during the course of the week and to answer a final question on the contest's seventh day.

Three winners will be drawn at random from all the correct responses received. The winners will win hundreds of dollars worth of literary stuff--stacks of books and free memberships in LibraryThing and even a text editor. See the complete prize list here and the official rules here.

If you're discovering this contest a little late in the week, don't worry. After they are initially announced, all six puzzles will remain available for the duration of the contest. Thus contestants who learn of the puzzle later in the week will not be barred from participating.

Here's the complete schedule of events:

July 1 -- Puzzle #1 introduced at Grumpy Old Bookman
July 2 -- Puzzle #2 introduced at Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
July 3 -- Puzzle #3 introduced at This Writing Life
July 4 -- Puzzle #4 introduced at Books, Inq.
July 5 -- Puzzle #5 introduced at Refrigerator Door
July 6 -- Puzzle #6 introduced at No Rules. Just Write
July 7 -- Final question posed at Buy a Friend a Book

Today's puzzle is a logic puzzle. Here are the puzzle's clues. Go to Buy a Friend a Book to print out the diagram you need to complete the puzzle.

The clues:

1. Chuck Noland shipped his package two days before Lawrance Bernabo's BAFAB gift was ordered at and shipped by Amazon.

2. Fiona Widdershins sent her package the day before Wayne Knight shipped his. She did not send her package to Boston.

3. The package sent by the U.S. Postal Service was shipped three days after someone used a secret drop in Frankfurt to deliver theirs.

4. The packaged delivered in Connecticut was sent the day after a package was shipped to Boston.

5. Three men sent off their BAFAB books before Wayne Knight sent his.

6. Because it was shipped on the first day of BAFAB Week, a lucky book recipient in Elba was able to finish reading War and Peace ere others ever received their packages.