Archives

April, 2009

Apr 22

2009

0

comments

Scott Pack on Buying the New Dan Brown

Don’t buy it at half price, for God’s sake. ASDA will be giv­ing it away as trol­ley ballast.

With Harry Potter now off shag­ging who­ever it is he ended up with in the final book, the super­mar­kets will, I am pretty sure, jump on any ‘event’ title with glee and do their level best to sell as many cop­ies as pos­sible. And love him or loathe him, a new book from Dan Brown is def­in­itely an event.

The Lost Symbol: The Real Losers

Apr 22

2009

0

comments

Bill Thompson: Brave, New, Inscrutable World

Beeb techie pun­dit chap Bill Thompson makes an inter­est­ing point about the two cul­tures — com­puter lit­er­ate and com­puter illit­er­ate — grow­ing apart in the digital age.

Far too many people who use com­puters every day, and have them in their homes, aren’t even cap­able of apply­ing the sys­tem updates that Microsoft and Apple auto­mat­ic­ally send out, leav­ing them with buggy and insec­ure sys­tems vul­ner­able to all sorts of attack.

You can fol­low Bill on Twitter, nat­ur­ally.

BBC NEWS | Technology | A nation of programmers?

Apr 20

2009

0

comments

Books to Go

The Bookseller has this to say about the Espresso, a new Print-On-Demand device that could see cus­tom­ers strolling into a book­shop and ask­ing for a copy of any book — the cheeky bastards.

I’ll admit that I was ori­gin­ally scep­tical about the qual­ity of the books pub­lished by the Espresso, I assumed that they would all have that “self pub­lished” feel to them, with pages mis­aligned and smudged jack­ets. But, hold­ing a freshly prin­ted and deli­ciously warm copy of Jason Epstein’s’ Book Business, my qualms dissolved.

By the way, that icky, ‘self-published’ feel is usu­ally the res­ult of good qual­ity paper.

The Espresso has landed | theBookseller.com

Apr 20

2009

2

comments

The Newspaper Is Dead; Long Live the Journalist

Sly Bailey, Trinity Mirror Chief Executive, on the death of newspapers.

If the pres­sures of this reces­sion put local news­pa­pers out of busi­ness, think very hard about what we will be left with when we do emerge the other side. Super-dominant digital play­ers like Google and the death of journ­al­ism as we know it.”

Absolutely not. The death of news­pa­pers won’t mean the death of journ­al­ism. The advert­ising rev­enue that propped up news­pa­pers dur­ing the nine­teenth and twen­ti­eth cen­tur­ies is still there. Now, it’s going to spe­cial­ist web­sites and blogs.

Most writers don’t write full time — i.e. the major­ity earn less than the min­imum wage from their writ­ing — but the activ­ity is seen as a voca­tion. Isn’t journ­al­ism a vocation?

BBC NEWS | UK | Warning of ‘death of journalism’

Apr 19

2009

2

comments

★ Enough Velvet Rope to Strangle Yourself

The first para­graph of this art­icle in yesterday’s Guardian Review made me smile.

Some injustices cry out to heaven for ven­geance, and here’s one: Derek Robinson hasn’t found a pub­lisher for his latest novel. (This is a man whose writ­ing was admired by Saul Bellow, for heaven’s sake.) So he’s done it him­self. Jolly good show.

Here, Nicholas Lezard is review­ing a self-published book by Derek Robinson. I haven’t read the book (and haven’t heard of Robinson, actu­ally; it turns out his first novel was nom­in­ated for the Booker in 1971), but this para­graph brought to mind one of the myths of pub­lish­ing: that you’re on the inside or the outside.

For the unpub­lished nov­el­ist, one of the greatest frus­tra­tions stems from your attempts to have your work read by a pub­lisher. It can feel like the burly door­man of the Publishing Club won’t let you in. In the real world, how would gain admit­tance to such a club? You can bribe the door­man, sneak in the back way, or try to inveigle your­self into the life of a card-carrying member.

The strength of this ‘no admit­tance’ feel­ing is so strong the writer can begin to feel that, once she’s got in, she’s in. That for cyn­ical or noble reas­ons, the man­age­ment of the club will recog­nise her tal­ents in perpetuity.

A few years back, a would-be writer (who is still a friend of mine) said, “It’s alright for you. You’re in the club.” This made my jaw drop. I had been pub­lished by a bleeding-edge out­fit and told (I was happy to be told) to learn about self-promotion and go and do some. I did. But I was on my own the whole time. There was no sense that I was the mem­ber of the estab­lish­ment. True, I was lucky enough for sev­eral prom­in­ent writers — Ken MacLeod, Ian Watson, and so on — to review my book in pos­it­ive terms, but nobody sent me a badge.

There’s no estab­lish­ment bey­ond the people that you bump into occa­sion­ally at book launches and other events; some­times they’re doing well, some­times not so well. Why not make your own club? You can put whatever music you like on the turntable. Feature a buf­fet. Go your own way. That’s what Derek Robinson has done, and more power to his quill.

Review: Hullo Russia, Goodbye England by Derek Robinson | Books | The Guardian

Apr 19

2009

0

comments

The Gollancz Science Fiction Classics Covers

Creative Review has been speak­ing to Gollancz about their new range of sci­ence fic­tion classics.

Each cover was cre­ated using A4 paper, with all the typo­graphy prin­ted and placed on the struc­ture by hand,” Jones [says]. “We then pho­to­graphed each paper struc­ture and, upon see­ing the ori­ginal black and white images, we didn’t feel that any tweak­ing or fur­ther alter­a­tions were needed.”

A good example of strik­ing design. These cov­ers stand out and — not typ­ic­ally for sci­ence fic­tion — there is a clear sense that the cover reflects the iden­tity of the book.

CR Blog » Blog Archive » Low-Fi Sci-Fi

Apr 18

2009

0

comments

Charlie Kaufman on Reviews, Structure and Fame

On the strength of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, I’d put Charlie Kaufman in the same box as Hemingway.

Reviews:

I tend to not only read reviews, but also every little stu­pid thing online. It’s a very bad idea, and there’s a lot of angry people in the world. And it’s weird to absorb all that weirdness.”

Structure:

There’s this inher­ent screen­play struc­ture that every­one seems to be stuck on, this three-act thing. It doesn’t really interest me. To me, it’s kind of like say­ing, ‘Well, when you do a paint­ing, you always need to have sky here, the per­son here and the ground here.’ Well, you don’t. In other art forms or other medi­ums, they accept that it’s just some­thing avail­able for you to work with. I actu­ally think I’m prob­ably more inter­ested in struc­ture than most people who write screen­plays, because I think about it.”

Fame:

He insists the Oscar means little: “I like hav­ing the trophy, but only on a very sur­facey level does it mean any­thing. It’s just kind of a… Kerouac has a line about fame being a news­pa­per. You know that line? When I read that when I was a teen­ager, I didn’t know what it meant, but now… Fame doesn’t really fill you up in any way.”

A few days ago, I heard that Robert McKee’s Story is avail­able as an audiobook. I read it as a teen­ager, think­ing I’d be learn­ing the ropes, and in a sense I did, but rather more because the points at which I dis­agreed with McKee forced me to think about what we mean by an act, or a scene. I’m still not sure.

Laura Barton meets film dir­ector Charlie Kaufman | Film | The Guardian

Apr 17

2009

0

comments

Roger Morris Speaks

Well, types. The truth is, m’colleague Roger Morris has been inter­viewed by thev­iew­from­here. Parts 1 and 2 are now available.

[…] There was a launch party for the Macmillan New Writing imprint, and I met the reader who had pulled my book out of the slush pile. That was a great moment. She took the trouble to find me and con­grat­u­late me and say how much she had enjoyed the book. Needless to say, I was extremely grate­ful to her.

Back in the day, I reviewed Roger’s excel­lent Taking Comfort.

The view from here: Interview with R N Morris — Part 1 of 2

Apr 16

2009

2

comments

Publetariat

Avast: there’s an online magazine ded­ic­ated to the pub­let­ariat — people who publish.

For far too long, indie authors and small imprints have fought an uphill battle against an industry and a com­munity of writers determ­ined to mar­gin­al­ize us and our efforts. Now, as indie author­ship stands poised to become the ‘next big thing’ in pub­lish­ing, our time has come at last. 

Right on, comrade.

About Publetariat | www.publetariat.com

Apr 15

2009

0

comments

How to Talk to a Professor

Michael Leddy, over at Orange Crate Art, has some great tips for stu­dents on how to approach a pro­fessor. Being US-based, there will be dif­fer­ences for UK stu­dents. Don’t call someone a pro­fessor unless they really are a pro­fessor — oth­er­wise they’ll think you’re tak­ing the piss.

Some of my best col­lege memor­ies are of talk­ing with my pro­fess­ors in their offices. I was a shy kid (still am!), and I treas­ured the chance to ask ques­tions and try out ideas dur­ing office hours. Sitting with my coat and books piled on the floor, I found my way into the pos­sib­il­it­ies of genu­ine intel­lec­tual dia­logue. You can do that too.

Orange Crate Art: How to talk to a professor